Comparison
SpotCheck vs SubmitHub
SubmitHub and SpotCheck solve different halves of the same problem. SubmitHub is where you submit tracks to curators and pay per submission. SpotCheck is what you run first, to decide which playlists are worth paying for at all.
They’re complementary — but if you only pick one place to spend your next pound, it’s worth understanding what each actually does.
At a glance
| SpotCheck | SubmitHub | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Independent bot-risk checker (browser extension) | Submission marketplace |
| Cost to check a playlist | Free (headline score); £4.99/mo Pro for full detail | Per-submission fees (~£30–60 per batch) |
| Bot-risk score | Yes — transparent 0–100 with factors | Limited; curator stats vary |
| Follower history | Yes — snapshots over time | No |
| Independent of the curator | Yes — you vet from the outside | You evaluate from inside the marketplace |
| Works on any public playlist | Yes — on the Spotify page itself | Only listed curators |
The verdict
Use SpotCheck to vet your shortlist and cut the bot-inflated lists, then use SubmitHub (or pitch directly) to submit to the curators that survive. The two together waste far less than submitting blind.
FAQ
Is SpotCheck a replacement for SubmitHub?
No — they’re complementary. SpotCheck vets whether a playlist is worth paying for; SubmitHub is one place to submit once you’ve decided. Vetting first means you spend SubmitHub fees only on real curators.
Can I check SubmitHub curators with SpotCheck?
Yes. SpotCheck works on any public Spotify playlist, so you can score a curator’s playlist before submitting to them anywhere.
Vet any playlist free
Score bot risk on any Spotify playlist before you pay a penny. See plans.
Start a 7-day free Pro trialLast updated 2026-06-22.